{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb26c9287ef87811438a58b/5f2c8b6c01a8a85e7cd15358?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Sue Provenzano on Pleading Standards & Speech Act Theory","description":"<p>In this episode, <a href=\"https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/SusanProvenzano/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Susan E. Provenzano</a>, William Trumbull Professor of Practice at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, discusses her article \"<a href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3613626\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Can Speech Act Theory Save Notice Pleading?</a>,\" which will be published in the Indiana Law Journal. Provenzano begins by describing the history of notice pleading, and how it was changed by <em>Twombly</em> and <em>Iqbal</em>. She breaks down how the introduction of \"plausibility\" affected notice pleading, and how courts and scholars have reacted. She argues that speech act theory can help clarify the content of a complaint, and enable courts to focus on plausibility more clearly. Provenzano's scholarship is available on <a href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=602803\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">SSRN</a>.</p><p>This episode was hosted by&nbsp;<a href=\"http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at&nbsp;<a href=\"https://twitter.com/brianlfrye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@brianlfrye</a>.</p>","author_name":"CC0/Public Domain"}