{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb26c9287ef87811438a58b/5eb05fac48136f854488078f?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Carliss Chatman & Anthony Kreis on Reproductive Rights","description":"<p>In this episode, <a href=\"https://law.wlu.edu/faculty/full-time-faculty/carliss-chatman\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Carliss N. Chatman</a>, Assistant Professor of Law at Washington and Lee University School of Law, and <a href=\"https://www.kentlaw.iit.edu/faculty/anthony-kreis\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Anthony Michael Kreis</a>, Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law, discuss Chatman's essay \"<a href=\"https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol76/iss2/2/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">If a Fetus Is a Person, It Should Get Child Support, Due Process, and Citizenship</a>\" and Kreis's response, \"<a href=\"https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol76/iss2/4/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Under Ten Eyes</a>,\" both of which <a href=\"https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">are published</a> in the Washington and Lee Law Review Online. Chatman's essay is based on her <a href=\"https://twitter.com/carlissc/status/1126441510063542272\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">viral tweet</a> and <a href=\"https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/if-a-fetus-is-a-person-it-should-get-child-support-due-process-and-citizenship/2019/05/17/7280ae30-78ac-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Washington Post op-ed</a>, arguing that state laws intended to make fetuses persons for the purpose of abortion law, should also make fetuses persons in relation to other laws, and teasing out the consequences. Kreis's response reflects on how Chatman's essay draws into relief the entire constitutional debate over reproductive rights, in historical context. Chatman is on Twitter at <a href=\"https://twitter.com/carlissc\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@carlissc</a> and Kreis is at <a href=\"https://twitter.com/AnthonyMKreis\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@AnthonyMKreis</a>.</p><p>This episode was hosted by&nbsp;<a href=\"http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at&nbsp;<a href=\"https://twitter.com/brianlfrye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@brianlfrye</a>.</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"CC0/Public Domain"}