{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb26c9287ef87811438a58b/5dbbabf4a1f923104d91aa35?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Ilya Somin on Federalism and Sanctuary Cities","description":"<p>In this episode, <a href=\"https://sls.gmu.edu/ilya-somin/\" target=\"_blank\">Ilya Somin</a>, Professor of Law at the George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, discusses his article, \"<a href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3347171\" target=\"_blank\">Making Federalism Great Again: How the Trump Administration's Attack on Sanctuary Cities Unintentionally Strengthened Judicial Protection for State Autonomy</a>,\" which is published in the Texas Law Review. Somin begins by explaining what a \"sanctuary city\" is and how the Trump administration has tried to block sanctuary city legislation. He describes the different approaches the administration has taken, and the federalism-based defenses raised by sanctuary cities, which sound in the Spending Clause and the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine. He observes that the defenses have been effective, and reflects on whether they reflect opportunism or a new reflect for federalism as a way of checking government power. You can read his related Washington Post op-ed <a href=\"https://www.washingtonpost.com/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>. Somin is on Twitter at <a href=\"https://twitter.com/IlyaSomin\" target=\"_blank\">@IlyaSomin</a>.</p><p>This episode was hosted by&nbsp;<a href=\"http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye\" target=\"_blank\">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at&nbsp;<a href=\"https://twitter.com/brianlfrye\" target=\"_blank\">@brianlfrye</a>.</p>","author_name":"CC0/Public Domain"}