{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb26c9287ef87811438a58b/5c13ff6b76bffd3a690886d0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Alexandra Roberts on Trademark Failure to Function","description":"<p>In this episode, <a href=\"https://law.unh.edu/person/alexandra-j-roberts\" target=\"_blank\">Alexandra J. Roberts</a>, Associate Professor of Law at the University of New Hampshire School of Law, discusses her article \"<a href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2916731\" target=\"_blank\">Trademark Failure to Function</a>,\" which will appear in the Iowa Law Review. Roberts begins by describing what trademarks are for and when they exist. She notes that a mark must be distinctive and be used as trademark in order to function as a trademark. But the Trademark Office and the courts tend to emphasize distinctiveness and de-emphasize use as a mark. She argues this is a problem, because it does not reflect how consumers actually experience marks, and suggests that distinctiveness and use should be measured together. Roberts is on Twitter at <a href=\"https://twitter.com/lexlanham\" target=\"_blank\">@lexlanham</a>.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong>&nbsp;trademarks, uspto, registration, distinctiveness, use, intellectual property, behavioral realism, marketing, advertising</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"CC0/Public Domain"}