{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/59ca8dc677c5a6bd526268d7/5e6409e6d7efedfa04c74bbf?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"287 - The Packers Don't Need a Defensive Lineman (But Should be Looking Anyway)","description":"<p>The Packers don’t <em>need</em> a defensive lineman, per se, but another big guy is never a bad thing to have. In a year where there’s not necessarily a bumper crop of prospects, who should the Packers take?</p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://thepowersweep.com/blog/what-book-should-we-read-for-the-blue-58-book-club\" target=\"_blank\">Don't forget to vote in our poll for the Blue 58 book club</a>! Which book do you think we should read?</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Wide receiver discussion follow up (2:01)</strong></p><p>Let's catch up on a couple of things we missed in our wide receiver discussion, including a question on how to project one specific attribute.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Defensive linemen still valuable in a shallow class (12:19)</strong></p><p>There aren't just tons of great defensive linemen available this year, but there's still value to be had. How do you know what's valuable, though?</p><p><br></p><p><strong>So what defensive lineman should the Packers take? (28:02)</strong></p><p>That's the real question, isn't it? Here's who I'm looking at as prospects worth considering.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>SUPPORT BLUE 58</strong></p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://www.patreon.com/thepowersweep\" target=\"_blank\">Donate to our Patreon</a> - $1 per month offsets our podcast hosting costs.</p><p><a href=\"https://teespring.com/stores/the-power-sweep-3\" target=\"_blank\">Buy a T-Shirt or Sweatshirt</a> - Look good while supporting The Power Sweep.</p><p>Leave us a 5-Star Review on iTunes - It helps more people find the show!</p>","author_name":"The Power Sweep"}