{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/57b498490b5f3f772a76004a/585c69af88d80d2d4a1f77e3?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Episode 91: Paolo Santorio discusses counterfactuals","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/57b498490b5f3f772a76004a/585c69af88d80d2d4a1f77e3.png?height=200","description":"In this episode, Paolo Santorio argues that to explain what statements like 'If A were, then B would be' mean, we need to understand them as statements about causal networks.","author_name":"Matt Teichman"}