{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/39fc4a99-8861-437d-81e2-684d13e48f92/04a62fe6-d9f8-409a-9ddb-c6a354c13367?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Money talks: Purpose vs profit","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/62e286a934d4d92155874248/62e286c552234400120ceb79.jpg?height=200","description":"<p>What are companies for? The orthodoxy was that they exist primarily to pursue profit. But a new faith in <a href=\"https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/08/22/big-business-is-beginning-to-accept-broader-social-responsibilities\" target=\"_blank\">higher corporate purpose</a> as a means to address social injustice, climate change and inequality is sweeping the Western business world. How much is this trend of “reverse Friedmanism” going to <a href=\"https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/08/22/what-companies-are-for\" target=\"_blank\">change what it means to do business</a>? Or could chief executives playing politics have dangerous consequences? Tamzin Booth hosts</p>","author_name":"The Economist"}