{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/0fc6a233-bbae-4ba5-b882-c075544353a8/654cdc258290a10012b18a9c?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Two games, twelve goals, one VAR","description":"<p><br></p><p>The Thurs team of Martin Samuel, Tony Cascarino and Gregor Robertson join Tom Clarke to discuss one thing…VAR. With two thrilling games and twelve goals between them the Man Utd v Copenhagen and Spurs v Chelsea games were dominated by VAR. Is it inevitable, will it change or will football adapt to a brave new world? Discuss…</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Timeline</strong></p><p><strong><em>VAR and Man Utd</em></strong></p><p>10’ is football and footballers now going to change.</p><p>12’ how do you police a subjective game played in milliseconds.</p><p>16’ the difference in officiating and the interpretation of rules.</p><p>22’ Positives for Man United despite losing the game. </p><p>26’ Copenhagen not a good team, don’t get carried away.</p><p>34’ All to random at Man U. Performances are fractured</p><p><br></p><p><strong><em>VAR and Chelsea Spurs</em></strong></p><p>38’ Romero red card…</p><p>41’ Intent or not intent. How to define it.</p><p>47’ Offside, Jackson had a yard start, but it was phase two. Is that fair? Martin thinks the rules are nonsense. Active or inactive.</p><p>51’ We’re talking about VAR, not about football.</p><p>58’ Ange and his brave…or crazy tactics. High line with nine men. Amazing spectacle, but not sure if it was the best approach. </p><p>59’ Glorious failure. They lost but they lost player to their philosophy.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>","author_name":"The Times"}