{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/0185cea5-9e3b-4b82-a887-26f91f92765f/6723b219ef013310c7329394?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"REBROADCAST: Politics of the life scientific","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b9f3b71a8cbe675f3cedcb/1730392489889-ce25e79e-ff73-42f0-9a87-2affe6c6aab6.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p><strong>This series was originally broadcast in 2020.</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>Science and politics are not easy bedfellows - \"Stick to the science\" is a three part series which aims to find out why.</strong></p><p><br></p><p>In this episode&nbsp;we're asking how politics shapes the life of a working scientist. Be it through funding agendas, cultural lobbies or personal bias, there's a myriad of ways in which politics can shape the game; influencing the direction and quality of research, But what does this mean for the objective ideals of science?</p><p><br></p><p><em>This episode was produced by Nick Petrić Howe, with editing from Noah Baker and Benjamin Thompson. it featured contributions from many people, including: Mayana Zatz, Shobita Parthasarathy, Michael Erard, Peg AtKisson, Susannah Gal, Allen Rostron, Mark Rosenberg, and Alice Bell. </em></p><p><br></p><p><strong>Further Reading</strong></p><p><a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02484-w\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Brazil’s budget cuts threaten more than 80,000 science scholarships</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/brazil-s-wealthiest-state-scientists-fear-budget-plan-could-cripple-research\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Move to reallocate funds from scientific institutions in São Paulo</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/republicans-attempt-to-use-mockery-to-cut-sound-science/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Backlash to “Shrimps on a treadmill”</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993413/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Explanation of the Dickey Amendment</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03882-w\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">After over 20 years the CDC can now fund gun violence research</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631137/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Spirometer use “race-correction” software</a></p><p><a href=\"https://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6045/1015.full\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Black researchers less likely to get funding from the National Institutes of Health in the US</a></p><p><a href=\"https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/10/eaaw7238\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Black researchers may get less funding from the National Institutes of Health due to topic choice</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02681-y\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Black researchers fill fewer academic roles in the UK</a></p><p><a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280618301889\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Clinical trials use mostly white participants</a></p><p><a href=\"https://shobitap.org/the-received-wisdom\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">The Received Wisdom Podcast, with Shobita Parthasarathy</a></p>","author_name":"Springer Nature Limited"}