{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/0185cea5-9e3b-4b82-a887-26f91f92765f/5421f50d-0c2a-4037-ab2a-18f5963f82d5?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Long Read Podcast: Are feelings more than skin deep?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b9f3b71a8cbe675f3cedcb/61b9f40a77010000158180b1.jpg?height=200","description":"<p>Research in the 1960s and 1970s suggested that emotional expressions – smiling when happy, scowling when angry, and so on – were universal. This idea stood unchallenged for a generation.</p><p><br></p><p>But a new cohort of psychologists and cognitive scientists are revisiting the data. Many researchers now think that the picture is a lot more complicated, and that facial expressions vary widely between contexts and cultures.</p><p><br></p><p>This is an audio version of our feature: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00507-5\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Why faces don’t always tell the truth about feelings</a>, written by Douglas Heaven and read by Kerri Smith.</p>","author_name":"Springer Nature Limited"}