Share
AI News & Strategy Daily with Nate B. Jones
Stop accepting AI output that "looks right." The other 17% is everything and nobody is ready for it.
•
What's really happening when frontier models beat professionals with 14 years of experience 70% of the time but the output still doesn't survive contact with anyone who actually understands the domain? The common story is about prompting and workflow design—but the reality is more interesting when rejection creates institutional knowledge that did not exist before.
In this video, I share the inside scoop on why learning to say no is the missing skill in the judgment and taste category:
• Why your rejections are more valuable than your prompts
• How recognition, articulation, and encoding break down into learnable dimensions
• What Epic Systems teaches about scaling taste through thousands of encoded workflows
• Where the structural gap in the AI tool ecosystem leaves every rejection on the floor
For anyone watching AI flood organizations with output, the frontier of AI value is identical to the frontier of your organization's taste.
Chapters
00:00 Your Most Valuable AI Skill Is Actually Saying No
02:15 What Happens in the Moment of Rejection
04:30 Why Generation Skills Are Now Commodity
06:30 GDPVal: AI Beats Professionals 70% of the Time
08:15 Recognition: Detecting When Something Is Wrong
10:00 Articulation: Explaining Why in Usable Constraints
12:00 Encoding: Making Rejections Persist Beyond the Moment
14:00 The Epic Systems Lesson: Scaling Taste Across Decades
16:15 Building Infrastructure to Scale Your No's
18:15 What This Means for Teams and Individuals
Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.
For deeper playbooks and analysis: My site: https://natebjones.com
Full Story w/ Prompts + Guide: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/p/the-most-expensive-ai-mistake-isnt?r=1z4sm5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
___________________
More episodes
View all episodes
NVIDIA World Models Explained: What Developers Can Build
46:26|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What does a world model actually do—and why might a robot learn to fold your laundry before it can make perfect scrambled eggs?Nate sits down with Ming-Yu Liu, VP of Cosmos Lab at NVIDIA, to explore how world models turn observations into predictions and physical actions. They discuss where the analogy to language models helps, where it breaks down, and why knowing whether an action worked can be harder than generating the action itself.How simulation lets builders test many kitchens and situations before returning to a real robot.Why robots in the field face different timing and compute constraints from services in a data center.What researchers can—and cannot—conclude about a model’s understanding of physics.How verifiable results change the pace of learning, from folding laundry to judging food.For builders and operators, this conversation connects the models to the practical questions: what can be tested, what must happen immediately, and where human judgment is still needed.Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.AI-Native Workplace: What Real AI Adoption Asks of You
42:28|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What changes when AI can work across your computer instead of waiting for you to move information between apps?Nate sits down with Andrew and Akshay at OpenAI to explore how AI is changing their own work: where adoption takes hold, what makes useful context available, and what people do when the busy work starts to disappear.In this conversation:How access to the right context can change who uses AI at work.What it means to share a computer with an agent.Why voice input and written output solve different problems.How orchestration, experimentation, and human judgment fit together.What a tax-error discovery reveals about useful automation.For builders and operators, the discussion brings the focus back to everyday work: which tasks to hand over, which decisions still need attention, and how to recognize when a tool is actually helping.Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.You cannot tell which parts of your software should stop calling an LLM. My Jev guide has a prompt that scans your projects and names them.
33:01|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What's really happening when a model can read a complicated input but only choose among answers you supply?Nate explains why Jev's general-purpose classification could change where intelligence appears in software. He walks through support routing, tax documents, research prioritization, agent orchestration, and spreadsheets that respond to meaning.Why complicated inputs and simple outputs define a useful class of problems.How classifiers, generative models, and ordinary code fit together.What lower classification costs make possible for teams and individual builders.Where testing still matters, and how to try Jev with a coding agent.For builders and operators, the opportunity is to revisit decisions that were previously too expensive to automate—and test what happens when those decisions become cheap enough to use throughout a workflow.Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.AI Cost to Serve: Which Customers You Can Now Afford
30:56|What happens to your AI bill when agents improve and more people start using them? Nate draws on his conversations at Dreamforce to examine the cost of wider adoption, the work agents can make affordable, and the decisions that change cost per successful result.The discussion covers redesigning workflows, routing routine work to cheaper models, matching an agent’s surrounding software to its capabilities, and evaluating results before scaling up.More analysis and practical playbooks: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/Editorial note: Draft podcast copy; current Acast house format has not been independently confirmed. No chapters included.Stripe on Agentic Commerce: Can AI Agents Buy From You?
30:48|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What has to change before AI agents can buy and sell on our behalf?Nate talks with Emily Sands, Head of AI and Data at Stripe, about the trust infrastructure behind agent commerce—and the new problems that appear when software becomes a customer.They explore token theft and free-trial abuse, why agents challenge sales-led distribution, how Stripe is adapting its tools for agents, and the unsettled economics of AI pricing. The conversation moves from a practical question—would you trust AI to buy your couch?—to the infrastructure needed for those decisions to become routine.Topics include:Why stealing tokens can matter more than stealing moneyThe tradeoff between protecting free trials and preserving product-led growthWhat agents need to discover and use developer toolsTrust, identity, and payment rails for agent commerceRelentless procurement agents and the pricing questions they createSubscribe for daily AI strategy and news.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Good Enough AI: Why Apple's Case Measures the Wrong Thing
29:25|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What’s really happening in the competition between Apple and OpenAI? The launch products give us one part of the story. The larger question is which company earns the right to hold your work, context, and trust.In this episode, Nate examines Apple’s new hardware, local AI strategy, and the recurring relationship that AI agents could build with their users.Why selling the phone may not mean owning the most valuable customer relationshipHow cheap local compute can make room for uses nobody anticipatedWhat Siri and health guidance must do to earn trustWhere Google and Nvidia fit in Apple’s strategyWhy the fine print about paid AI access mattersFor builders and operators, the question is where your working life accumulates—and what an AI would have to do to keep earning its bill.Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.AI Race vs Human Flourishing: What US-China Talks Miss
48:23|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What would it take for AI to make life more abundant—and who gets to share in that abundance?Nate Jones sits down with Alvin Graylin to discuss US–China cooperation, the economics of AI infrastructure, and what people can do as intelligence becomes widely available.Why Graylin challenges the idea that AI must be a race with one winner.How specialization and human judgment may change as AI improves.What infrastructure spending and corporate adoption reveal about the transition.Why scarcity, cooperation, and shared benefits matter to the future they describe.A conversation for builders, leaders, and anyone trying to decide where human effort matters next. Predictions and market comparisons reflect the speakers’ views.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Omarchy, the Agentic OS Built for AI Agents
17:58|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What changes when an AI agent can help change the way your computer works?Nate explores Omarchy as a glimpse of a more adaptable computer: one where an agent can help find settings, understand configuration files, apply a scoped change and check the result.In this episode:Why the audience for a software change can be one person.What agents need to make useful changes to an operating system.How to match permissions to the task and keep real accounts in view.Where AeroSpace, Apple Shortcuts and PowerToys Workspaces offer practical starting points on Mac and Windows.You do not have to replace the operating system you depend on to explore the possibilities. Start with a specific annoyance, a small change and a way to undo it.Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra: Which Model Gets Which Job
16:20|For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/What changes when two AI models can turn the same short prompt into two different, usable apps?Nate compares Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra by building clipboard tools, trying them, and asking for the changes that only become clear after real use.How one opening prompt produced Ledge and Shelf.Why small details such as hotkeys and copy confirmation change the experience.How faster iteration influenced Nate’s preference in this specific build.Why different models can reveal preferences you had not yet decided.For builders and operators, the useful question extends beyond the first response: how quickly can you try the result, identify what matters, and improve it?Get Shelf and Ledge: https://unlock-ai.natebjones.com/apps/shelf-ledgeHosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.