Share

cover art for #124 - Flagpoling, with Arshdeep Kahlon

Borderlines

#124 - Flagpoling, with Arshdeep Kahlon

Arshdeep Kahlon is an immigration lawyer in Brampton. He was counsel in Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 1369, where the Court had to determine whether it is misrepresentation for an applicant in a visa application to not disclose that they were previously not granted entry to the United States while flagpoling.


Topics include what flagpoling is, when one should flagpole vs. applying for a visa online, misrepresentation, how judicial reviews work and advocacy strategies and tips.

More episodes

View all episodes

  • #170 - Getting Divorced in Canada, with Ari Wormelli

    59:24|
    Ari Wormelli joins to discuss how to get divorced in Canada, and its intersection with Canadian immigration law.Topics discussed include non-accompanying spouses agreeing to or contesting divorce with prospective immigrants in Canada, practical barriers, serving legal documents internationally, getting foreign divorces recognized in Canada, annullment in the Philippines, marriages under fake IDs, and break down an actual case.Timestamps:0:19 - Welcome and Guest Introduction0:52 - Diving into Messy Divorces2:17 - How Divorce Works in Canada5:09 - Divorcing with an Overseas Spouse10:20 - Divorce in Countries Without Divorce (e.g., Philippines)15:21 - Conflicts of Law in Divorce Recognition21:56 - Case Study: Canadian Sponsor with Pakistani & Canadian Divorces26:04 - Recognizing Foreign Divorces in Canada34:19 - Marriages Under Fake IDs47:30 - Marriage in Canada Without Legal Status50:52 - Timeline for an Uncontested Divorce in Canada56:00 - Final Thoughts & Key Takeaways
  • #169 - H&C Applications, with Raj Sharma and Hannah Lindy

    56:18|
    Join us for an insightful episode of the Borderlines Podcast, featuring Raj Sharma and Hannah Lindy, both individuals with extensive experience submitting Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) applications. In this episode, we dive deep into H&C applications under section 25 of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Learn what H&C applications are, who can apply, and the key factors officers consider, including the best interests of children and compelling circumstances. We discuss challenges like high refusal rates, the impact of the 2025 Levels Plan, and the importance of strong advocacy. Whether you're an applicant, practitioner, or curious about Canadian immigration, this episode is packed with expert insights and practical advice.
  • #168 - Judicial Review AMA

    01:01:38|
    Immigration lawyer Lev Abramovich returns to discuss frequently asked questions regarding judicial review. This episode offers valuable guidance for legal professionals, consultants, and those navigating immigration processes. Topics Addressed:(1:49) The IRGC(6:32) Bill C-2(10:48) What is judicial review, and how does it differ from an appeal?(13:30) When faced with an H&C refusal, what factors determine whether to reapply or seek judicial review?(19:29) How do you proceed with a judicial review of a Chinook refusal when GCMS notes repeat the refusal letter?(27:33) When should someone use mandamus, and what factors influence this decision?(36:37) Why is there a lack of legislation to enforce compliance with federal court decisions or settlements, and how often are files refused again after judicial review?(43:51) Is the Immigration Division’s interpretation of the law subject to judicial review?(44:43) How long does it take to decide whether to file a judicial review?(45:54) What’s the difference between Rule 9 and GCMS notes in preparing a judicial review?(50:16) Can you file a judicial review for a study permit refusal from three months ago?(52:50) Should you pursue a judicial review for an application where a reconsideration request was already made?
  • #167 - A Life in Immigration Law: Gordon Maynard on Collegiality, Discretion, and Staying Human

    01:07:26|
    In this heartfelt episode, we sit down with Gordon Maynard, a recently retired immigration lawyer, to reflect on his remarkable 35-year career. Gordon shares how he sustained a long and fulfilling practice through the camaraderie and support of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA), mentorship from peers, and the value of in-person connections. He discusses the critical role of the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) in providing equitable discretion for permanent residents facing removal, critiques the erosion of human interaction in modern immigration processes due to centralization and AI, and highlights how physical activities like biking up Seymour Mountain every week helped maintain mental resilience. Gordon also offers wisdom for young lawyers, including urging them to diversify their practice across corporate and enforcement work, stay connected through the CBA, and embrace the human side of immigration law.
  • #166 - The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

    01:04:09|
    Ali Esnaashari and Kaveh Shahrooz join to discuss the Canadian immigration implications of Canada's decision to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization.Topics Explored:Historical Context of the IRGC: Understand the origins, structure, and global activities of the IRGC, including its role in the tragic downing of Ukraine International Flight PS752.Conscription and Inadmissibility: Learn how mandatory military service in Iran leads to Canadian inadmissibility findings for individuals performing routine tasks, such as administrative duties or even playing for government-affiliated sports teams, with no meaningful connection to terrorist activities.Legal Framework and Challenges: A detailed analysis of Section 34(1)(f) of Canada's Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, its broad application, and the low burden of proof that disproportionately impacts conscripts, alongside ongoing federal court cases addressing the definition of “membership.”Policy Shortcomings: Insight into the Canadian government’s rushed designation process, the absence of exemptions for conscripts, and the lack of consultation with stakeholders or training for immigration officers.Why This Matters:This designation has far-reaching consequences, affecting thousands of Iranians in Canada who face inadmissibility rulings despite having no ideological ties to the IRGC. With no humanitarian considerations, lengthy ministerial relief processes, an
  • #165 - Is Canada soft on crime? with Kyla Lee

    50:44|
    In this episode, Vancouver criminal defense lawyer and Driving Law podcast host Kyla Lee unpacks Canada’s criminal justice system, tackling listener questions on bail, sentencing, and mental health treatment. From the nuances of bail hearings and the presumption of innocence to the principles of sentencing like deterrence and rehabilitation, Kyla offers expert insights into how courts address crime, trauma, and addiction. She also explores controversial topics like involuntary treatment, the impact of Gladue reports for Indigenous offenders, and the challenges of prison overcrowding, while proposing solutions like supportive housing to address root causes of crime.
  • #164 - Inadmissibility for Human Rights Violations

    01:04:22|
    When permanent residents and foreign nationals can be found inadmissible for violating human or international rights.
  • #163 - Mini Flash Update on Work Permit Issues

    40:51|
    Deanna and Steve discuss an internal IRCC document listing numerous challenges that employers are having with IRCC, including processing delays, security screening, the BC PNP, high points in Express Entry, and more.
  • #162 - Canada's Aging Population, Demographics and Immigration, with Daniel Hiebert

    58:08|
    Daniel Hiebert is an Emeritus Professor of Geography at the University of British Columbia. We discuss his recent paper for the CD Howe Institute titled "Balancing Canada’s Population Growth and Ageing Through Immigration Policy." Those who support high immigration levels often say that Canada's ageing demographics makes immigration a necessity. This conversation is a deep dive into this issue. One thing is apparent. There are no easy solutions. It is going to take massive increases and changes to immigration levels and policy that likely are not sustainable or politically feasible.