Share
AI and the Future of Law
The Ethics of AI in Lawyering: Is It Unethical Not to Use AI?
Ep. 22
•
Is it possible that not using AI could soon be seen as unethical for lawyers? Bridget McCormack and Jen Leonard dive into two recent Georgia cases where savvy use of AI helped lawyers win major verdicts and why these examples could signal a turning point in professional responsibility.
Along the way, Bridget shares her AI "aha" moment with ChatGPT acting as a woods guide (and porcupine expert), while Jen explores how AI’s voice mode turbocharged her workflow. They also unpack the provocative AI 2027 Report, which predicts a near-future explosion of superintelligent AI and its impact on law, society, and ethics.
From personal injury trials to global AI arms races, this episode challenges listeners to reimagine what “competence” looks like in a rapidly evolving profession and why AI isn’t just a tool, but a future teammate you can’t afford to ignore.
Episode Highlights:
- (02:54) Bridget’s AI Aha: Using ChatGPT as a nature guide and getting schooled on porcupines
- (05:49) Jen’s AI Aha: Voice-mode website editing and using ElevenLabs for hands-free learning
- (9:50) What Just Happened: Exploring the AI 2027 Report and the path to superintelligence
- (19:16) Lawyers, Ethics, and AI: Two Georgia cases show why ethical duties may be shifting
- (23:45) Rethinking Client Advocacy: Why using AI could become a new professional mandate
Key Discussion Points:
- How AI is changing everyday problem-solving and new ways AI assistants boost productivity and creativity in professional work.
- The AI 2027 Forecast: Why researchers believe super intelligent AI could arrive by 2027—and what that means for law and society.
- Two medical malpractice cases illustrate how AI-assisted research and storytelling can transform trial outcomes.
- Why integrating AI thoughtfully may soon be required for ethical, client-centered lawyering.
- What rising anxiety around AI means for lawyers and their clients.
- How AI levels the playing field for plaintiffs’ lawyers, solo practitioners, and small firms.
Keywords:
AI and law, legal ethics, AI 2027 report, superintelligence, legal tech, ChatGPT, ElevenLabs, legal innovation, plaintiff lawyering, change management, client-centered lawyering, trial strategy, research automation, professional responsibility, future of work, AI acceleration
About the Podcast:
2030 Vision: AI and the Future of Law is your essential guide to how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal profession. Hosted by Bridget McCormack and Jen Leonard, this podcast dives into cutting-edge AI technologies, their applications, and the trends shaping the future of law. Join us to stay informed, inspired, and prepared for the AI revolution.
Produced by: Aaron Tran for the American Arbitration Association.
More episodes
View all episodes
61. AI Agents Are Reshaping Legal Work: What Lawyers Need to Know
34:26||Ep. 61AI agents are moving beyond answering questions to taking action. But what happens when AI can make decisions, complete tasks, and interact with other systems on its own? And what does that mean for lawyers?In this episode of AI and the Future of Law, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack explore the rise of agentic AI and its implications for legal practice. They share their experiences using Instinct, a personal AI assistant, discuss JEV and the possibility of AI verifying other AI systems, and examine how autonomous technology is changing the way lawyers work.From supervising AI agents like junior associates to managing AI training fatigue, Jen and Bridget consider the opportunities, challenges, and professional responsibilities emerging as AI becomes more autonomous.Key Discussion PointsHow AI agents differ from traditional chatbotsPersonal AI assistants and AI verification toolsSupervising AI agents and managing their actionsAI adoption, training fatigue, and law firm leadershipProfessional competence, ethics, and accountabilityAI and the Future of Law is hosted by Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack. A Creative Lawyers Podcast, sponsored by Clio.https://www.aiandthefutureoflaw.com/
60. AI Agents Broke Out. What the Hugging Face Incident Means for Lawyers
46:30||Ep. 60Season 4 of AI and the Future of Law begins with one of the most unsettling AI stories of the year: the Hugging Face incident, involving reports that OpenAI agents escaped a training sandbox, coordinated with one another, and accessed external systems.In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack unpack what happened, why it captured so much attention, and what it reveals about the next phase of AI safety, cybersecurity, and governance. They discuss how autonomous agents can create new risks for courts, law firms, legal departments, and the clients lawyers advise.The conversation also explores why AI governance cannot be treated like a one-time software approval. As frontier models become more capable, legal institutions will need ongoing oversight, stronger vendor diligence, better documentation, and practical systems for managing risk.Key topics include:The Hugging Face incident and why it mattersAutonomous AI agents and cyber riskAI governance beyond one-time approvalWhat courts and law firms should be watchingVendor diligence, documentation, and accountabilityWhy lawyers have a role in shaping AI oversightThroughout the episode, Jen and Bridget move beyond the headlines to focus on what lawyers should be thinking about now: accountability, cyber risk, regulation, courts, governance, and the legal work ahead.
59. Season 3 in Review: What AI Is Changing About the Future of Law
09:27||Ep. 59Season 3 of AI and the Future of Law explored a legal profession moving quickly from AI experimentation to real transformation.In this special recap episode, we revisit some of the season’s most memorable conversations about legal AI, agentic systems, law firm strategy, AI-native business models, professional competency, and the role human judgment will continue to play as the technology advances. Thank you to everyone who listened, followed, shared, and joined us throughout Season 3.AI and the Future of Law will return in October with Season 4 and more conversations about how artificial intelligence is reshaping the legal profession and the world around it.Subscribe on YouTube, follow the show on your favorite podcast platform, and leave a review if the conversations have been helpful to you.
58. How Judges Can Use AI Without Losing Human Judgment with Justice Jerod Tufte
32:02||Ep. 58How can judges use AI without delegating the human judgment at the center of their role?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Justice Jerod Tufte of the North Dakota Supreme Court for a conversation about AI, judicial workflows, public legal data, access to justice, and the future of courts.In this episode:How judges can use AI while preserving human judgmentWhy AI should support, not decide, judicial workHow AI can assist with records, citations, and bench memosWhy courts need guardrails for AI useHow AI may increase litigation volumeWhy public law should be accessible and AI-ready
57. Kirkland’s $500 Million AI Bet and the Future of Junior Lawyers
28:02||Ep. 57What does Kirkland & Ellis’ $500 million AI bet mean for Big Law — and for junior lawyers?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack discuss Kirkland’s reported investment in building its own proprietary AI platform and what it signals about the legal industry’s shift from AI adoption to AI building. They explain why Kirkland’s strategy may make sense for Kirkland, but why other firms should be careful not to copy it without considering their own strengths, clients, culture, and market position.Jen and Bridget also explore growing concerns about junior attorney development as AI takes on more entry-level legal work. If junior lawyers are no longer learning through the same kinds of assignments, how will firms help them build judgment, confidence, and expertise? And what new training models might emerge?The episode also includes an AI Aha! segment on practical AI use cases in everyday life and a What Just Happened discussion on Anthropic, model risk, and emerging government oversight of frontier AI systems.In this episode:Kirkland’s $500 million AI announcementBig Law’s shift from AI adoption to AI buildingWhy AI strategy should match firm strategyWhat AI means for junior associate developmentWhy learning by doing does not happen automaticallyHow firms might rethink legal trainingWhat Anthropic’s model-risk episode means for lawyers and clients
56. What Does It Mean to Be an AI-Ready Lawyer? Farrah Pepper and Kirsten Talmage on AI Competency
35:27||Ep. 56What does it mean to be an AI-ready lawyer?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Farrah Pepper, legal innovation partner at Harvey, and Kirsten Talmage, chief strategy officer at Practising Law Institute, to discuss The AI-Ready Lawyer: A Competency Framework for the AI Era.Farrah and Kirsten explain why the legal profession needs a shared language for AI competency, how the framework can help law firms, legal departments, law schools, and individual lawyers, and why AI training should focus on durable professional skills rather than any single tool. The conversation also explores new legal career paths, the importance of oversight and judgment, and how organizations can use the framework to assess training gaps and build AI fluency responsibly.In this episode:What it means to be an AI-ready lawyerWhy the legal profession needs a shared AI competency frameworkHow AI fluency differs from tool-specific trainingWhy human judgment, oversight, and ethics remain centralHow firms and legal departments can use the frameworkWhy smaller teams may benefit from AI training even moreHow law students can assess AI readiness in schools and employersLearn more about PLI’s AI-Ready Lawyer framework:[PLI AI-Ready Lawyer Framework]
55. What Is an AI-Native Law Firm? John Nay on Norm AI and Norm Law
27:28||Ep. 55What is an AI-native law firm?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by John Nay, founder and CEO of Norm AI and Norm Law, for a conversation about agentic law, AI-native legal services, and what it means to build legal work around agents rather than copilots.John explains how legal and regulatory reasoning can be embedded into AI agents, allowing them to perform first-pass work, learn from prior matters, and create compounding value over time. The conversation also explores how Norm Law combines attorneys, legal engineers, software engineers, and AI engineers; why client-specific knowledge can become persistent; and how outcome-based pricing may change the business model of legal services.The episode also examines client trust, human supervision, experienced legal talent, and the Legal AGI Lab’s research into how AI agents may be evaluated, benchmarked, and governed by law.Learn more about the Legal AGI Lab: https://lab.norm.aiIn this episode:What agentic law meansHow AI agents differ from copilotsWhat an AI-native law firm looks likeThe role of legal engineers and AI engineersOutcome-based pricing and client trustHuman supervision in AI-native legal workLegal AGI and the governance of AI agents
54. How AI Is Reshaping In-House Legal Teams with Nick Fleisher
29:54||Ep. 54How is AI changing the work of in-house legal teams?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Nick Fleisher, co-founder and CEO of Sandstone, an AI-native platform built specifically for in-house legal teams. Nick discusses how AI is transforming legal operations by helping legal departments manage intake, triage work, connect business context, and move from reactive service providers to proactive strategic partners.The conversation explores why successful legal AI depends on data and context rather than simply deploying another chatbot, how AI systems can learn legal judgment over time, what lawyers should automate first, and why human oversight remains essential as agentic workflows become more common. Nick also shares why corporate legal departments are under increasing pressure as AI accelerates work across the business, and what that means for the future of legal teams.In this episode:Why in-house legal teams are adopting AI differently than law firmsBuilding AI-native legal infrastructureWhy legal AI is fundamentally a data and context problemHow AI can help legal teams become more proactiveWhat AI can—and can't—learn from lawyersUnderstanding agentic workflows and human oversightWhy implementation is the key to successful AI adoption
53. Can Law Firms Redesign Themselves for AI? Jen Leonard on Unprecedented
36:18||Ep. 53Can law firms redesign themselves for a world shaped by generative AI?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Sharon Crane, president of Practising Law Institute, for a conversation about Jen’s new book, Unprecedented: Designing a Human-Centered Law Firm When Everything Is Changing. Together, they explore why law firm transformation is difficult, how storytelling can make change feel more accessible, and why collaboration, human-centered design, and practical experimentation matter in the AI era.The conversation also covers PLI’s AI competency framework, the value of business fables, the history of the Cravath system and the billable hour, how Jen used AI as a writing partner, and what the future of junior lawyer training might look like.Learn more about Unprecedented: Designing a Human-Centered Law Firm When Everything Is Changing:https://www.pli.edu/catalog/publications/treatise/unprecedented-designing-a-human-centered-law-firm-when-everything-is-changing/447974In this episode:Why law firm change requires human buy-inHow storytelling can make transformation more usableWhy the current legal business model is not inevitableHow AI can act as a co-intelligence, not a shortcutWhat junior lawyer training might look like in the AI era