Share
AI and the Future of Law
Navigating Regulatory Risk: How AI Will Impact the Future of Legal Engagement
Ep. 14
•
In this episode of 2030 Vision: AI and the Future of Law, hosts Bridget McCormack and Jen Leonard explore how generative AI is transforming legal and regulatory landscapes, focusing on two compelling examples: insights from the HBR article "Gen AI Makes Legal Action Cheap, and Companies Need to Prepare" and Adam Unikowski’s analysis of NEPA’s environmental impact statement process.
They begin with their AI aHa moments, highlighting how voice mode has revolutionized their interactions with generative AI, enabling multitasking and deep learning. The discussion transitions into defining synthetic data, explaining its growing significance for training AI models ethically and effectively.
In the main discussion, Bridget and Jen unpack how generative AI can disrupt regulatory processes, using examples like the crypto industry's AI-driven public commentary campaign to delay U.S. Treasury rulemaking. They also explore Adam Unikowski’s forward-looking suggestions for using AI to streamline environmental impact statements, improve public engagement, and reduce judicial burdens. The episode underscores AI's dual potential to drive efficiency while introducing new risks, emphasizing the importance of collaboration, education, and forward-thinking strategies.
Key Takeaways- Voice Mode as a Game-Changer: Voice mode allows seamless, conversational interactions with generative AI, enhancing productivity and enabling multitasking for legal professionals.
- Synthetic Data Addresses AI Training Challenges: AI-generated synthetic data mimics real-world data, solving issues like privacy concerns and limited training datasets while scaling AI responsibly.
- HBR Highlights Regulatory Risks of AI: The crypto industry’s use of generative AI to generate 120,000 public comments illustrates how AI can overwhelm regulatory systems, delaying rulemaking and introducing risks.
- Preparing for AI-Driven Legal Action: Businesses and law firms should adopt proactive strategies like red teaming, workshops, and collaborative data sharing to mitigate risks posed by AI in regulatory contexts.
- Generative AI in Environmental Law: Adam Unikowski’s analysis suggests AI could accelerate the creation of environmental impact statements, improve public engagement through dynamic interfaces, and reduce judicial review burdens.
- AI as a Tool for Procedural Efficiency: Using AI for procedural tasks in administrative and regulatory law can save time, enhance fairness, and allow humans to focus on complex decision-making.
Keywords: AI, Generative AI, Law, Legal Action, Voice Mode, Synthetic Data, Regulatory Processes, Public Commentary, Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), NEPA, Administrative Law, Crypto Industry, Risk Management, Collective Action, Procedural Efficiency, HBR Article, Adam Unikowski, Technology in Law, Judicial Review, Future of Law
About the Podcast: 2030 Vision: AI and the Future of Law is your essential guide to how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal profession. Hosted by Bridget McCormack and Jen Leonard, this podcast dives into cutting-edge AI technologies, their applications, and the trends shaping the future of law. Join us to stay informed, inspired, and prepared for the AI revolution.
Produced by: Aaron Tran for the American Arbitration Association.
More episodes
View all episodes
57. Kirkland’s $500 Million AI Bet and the Future of Junior Lawyers
28:02||Ep. 57What does Kirkland & Ellis’ $500 million AI bet mean for Big Law — and for junior lawyers?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack discuss Kirkland’s reported investment in building its own proprietary AI platform and what it signals about the legal industry’s shift from AI adoption to AI building. They explain why Kirkland’s strategy may make sense for Kirkland, but why other firms should be careful not to copy it without considering their own strengths, clients, culture, and market position.Jen and Bridget also explore growing concerns about junior attorney development as AI takes on more entry-level legal work. If junior lawyers are no longer learning through the same kinds of assignments, how will firms help them build judgment, confidence, and expertise? And what new training models might emerge?The episode also includes an AI Aha! segment on practical AI use cases in everyday life and a What Just Happened discussion on Anthropic, model risk, and emerging government oversight of frontier AI systems.In this episode:Kirkland’s $500 million AI announcementBig Law’s shift from AI adoption to AI buildingWhy AI strategy should match firm strategyWhat AI means for junior associate developmentWhy learning by doing does not happen automaticallyHow firms might rethink legal trainingWhat Anthropic’s model-risk episode means for lawyers and clients56. What Does It Mean to Be an AI-Ready Lawyer? Farrah Pepper and Kirsten Talmage on AI Competency
35:27||Ep. 56What does it mean to be an AI-ready lawyer?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Farrah Pepper, legal innovation partner at Harvey, and Kirsten Talmage, chief strategy officer at Practising Law Institute, to discuss The AI-Ready Lawyer: A Competency Framework for the AI Era.Farrah and Kirsten explain why the legal profession needs a shared language for AI competency, how the framework can help law firms, legal departments, law schools, and individual lawyers, and why AI training should focus on durable professional skills rather than any single tool. The conversation also explores new legal career paths, the importance of oversight and judgment, and how organizations can use the framework to assess training gaps and build AI fluency responsibly.In this episode:What it means to be an AI-ready lawyerWhy the legal profession needs a shared AI competency frameworkHow AI fluency differs from tool-specific trainingWhy human judgment, oversight, and ethics remain centralHow firms and legal departments can use the frameworkWhy smaller teams may benefit from AI training even moreHow law students can assess AI readiness in schools and employersLearn more about PLI’s AI-Ready Lawyer framework:[PLI AI-Ready Lawyer Framework]55. What Is an AI-Native Law Firm? John Nay on Norm AI and Norm Law
27:28||Ep. 55What is an AI-native law firm?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by John Nay, founder and CEO of Norm AI and Norm Law, for a conversation about agentic law, AI-native legal services, and what it means to build legal work around agents rather than copilots.John explains how legal and regulatory reasoning can be embedded into AI agents, allowing them to perform first-pass work, learn from prior matters, and create compounding value over time. The conversation also explores how Norm Law combines attorneys, legal engineers, software engineers, and AI engineers; why client-specific knowledge can become persistent; and how outcome-based pricing may change the business model of legal services.The episode also examines client trust, human supervision, experienced legal talent, and the Legal AGI Lab’s research into how AI agents may be evaluated, benchmarked, and governed by law.Learn more about the Legal AGI Lab: https://lab.norm.aiIn this episode:What agentic law meansHow AI agents differ from copilotsWhat an AI-native law firm looks likeThe role of legal engineers and AI engineersOutcome-based pricing and client trustHuman supervision in AI-native legal workLegal AGI and the governance of AI agents54. How AI Is Reshaping In-House Legal Teams with Nick Fleisher
29:54||Ep. 54How is AI changing the work of in-house legal teams?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Nick Fleisher, co-founder and CEO of Sandstone, an AI-native platform built specifically for in-house legal teams. Nick discusses how AI is transforming legal operations by helping legal departments manage intake, triage work, connect business context, and move from reactive service providers to proactive strategic partners.The conversation explores why successful legal AI depends on data and context rather than simply deploying another chatbot, how AI systems can learn legal judgment over time, what lawyers should automate first, and why human oversight remains essential as agentic workflows become more common. Nick also shares why corporate legal departments are under increasing pressure as AI accelerates work across the business, and what that means for the future of legal teams.In this episode:Why in-house legal teams are adopting AI differently than law firmsBuilding AI-native legal infrastructureWhy legal AI is fundamentally a data and context problemHow AI can help legal teams become more proactiveWhat AI can—and can't—learn from lawyersUnderstanding agentic workflows and human oversightWhy implementation is the key to successful AI adoption53. Can Law Firms Redesign Themselves for AI? Jen Leonard on Unprecedented
36:18||Ep. 53Can law firms redesign themselves for a world shaped by generative AI?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Sharon Crane, president of Practising Law Institute, for a conversation about Jen’s new book, Unprecedented: Designing a Human-Centered Law Firm When Everything Is Changing. Together, they explore why law firm transformation is difficult, how storytelling can make change feel more accessible, and why collaboration, human-centered design, and practical experimentation matter in the AI era.The conversation also covers PLI’s AI competency framework, the value of business fables, the history of the Cravath system and the billable hour, how Jen used AI as a writing partner, and what the future of junior lawyer training might look like.Learn more about Unprecedented: Designing a Human-Centered Law Firm When Everything Is Changing:https://www.pli.edu/catalog/publications/treatise/unprecedented-designing-a-human-centered-law-firm-when-everything-is-changing/447974In this episode:Why law firm change requires human buy-inHow storytelling can make transformation more usableWhy the current legal business model is not inevitableHow AI can act as a co-intelligence, not a shortcutWhat junior lawyer training might look like in the AI era52. Is Legal Tech in a Bubble? Nikki Shaver on AI Strategy and Legal Tech Growth
36:44||Ep. 52The legal tech market is growing fast—but is it a bubble, or the beginning of a new era for legal services?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Nikki Shaver, co-founder and CEO of Legaltech Hub, to discuss how AI is reshaping law firm strategy, pricing, technology selection, and competition. Nikki explains why firms are moving beyond efficiency as the main measure of AI value, how AI-native firms may challenge incumbents, and why agentic AI creates new governance and security questions for legal organizations.In this episode:How legal tech adoption has shifted since ChatGPTWhy AI value is moving from efficiency to qualityWhat AI-native firms mean for incumbent law firmsHow law firms should evaluate legal tech startupsWhy agentic AI raises new governance risksWhat Nikki expects next for the legal tech marketKeywords:legal tech, legal technology, AI in law, legal AI, law firm strategy, Nikki Shaver, Legaltech Hub, agentic AI, AI-native firms, law firm innovation, legal innovation, GenAI, legal tech bubble, future of law51. What Happens When AI Agents Make Contracts? Bridget McCormack on LCP
38:17||Ep. 51What happens when AI agents start making contracts with other AI agents?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack explore Legal Context Protocol, or LCP, a new open protocol designed to help legal terms become discoverable, verifiable, and connected to agentic transactions. Bridget explains why existing e-commerce legal infrastructure may not translate cleanly to a world where machines negotiate, accept terms, and complete transactions on behalf of people and businesses.In this episode:What Legal Context Protocol is designed to solveWhy agentic commerce creates new contract and ratification issuesHow legal terms can become discoverable, verifiable, and connected to transactionsWhy AI risk and legal-context risk should be separatedWhat general counsel and law firm partners should do now50. Can AI Make Lawyers Better? Daniel Schwarcz on AI and Human Legal Reasoning
33:28||Ep. 50Can AI help lawyers learn—or does it weaken the skills legal training is meant to build?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Daniel Schwarcz, Fredrikson & Byron Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School, to discuss new empirical research on artificial intelligence and human legal reasoning. Daniel explains a randomized control trial studying how law students used AI to synthesize legal materials, apply legal rules, and revise legal analysis—and why some results surprised even the researchers.In this episode:Why legal training may prepare lawyers to use AI wellWhat the University of Minnesota study tested about AI and legal reasoningWhy AI-assisted students performed better than expectedThe risks of using AI for revision under time pressureWhat law schools and law firms should take away from the research49. The Am Law 100 Power Rankings: What’s Changing in Big Law with Jae Um
53:03||Ep. 49The latest Am Law 100 power rankings reveal a legal industry undergoing rapid transformation—driven by shifting demand, intensifying competition, and the growing influence of AI. In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by legal industry analyst Jae Um to break down what’s changing in Big Law. They explore the rise of “apex predator” firms, widening performance gaps, evolving AI strategies, and early signs of client-side disruption.In this episode:Am Law 100 power rankings and market concentrationThe rise of “apex predator” firmsAI strategy and firm-level competitionShifting client demand and pricing pressureThe future structure of Big Law